The great charm that attracted me, leads me to think about how often a child would have been time travel.
I mean, technically and conceptually potrebbe essere.
Poi con l’età che avanza l'encefalo si rilassa e certi interrogativi non te li poni più.
Adesso nello scofanarmi giorno dopo giorno le puntate di Dragonball Z, questa roba è tornata a galla.
Viaggiare nel tempo, come Trunks. O quasi.
Secondo me, come lo fanno vedere in Dragonball, non può funzionare. Viaggiare nel tempo dovrebbe comunque vincolarsi all’unicità dell’individuo.
Non ci possono essere doppioni insomma. Trunks, non dovrebbe trovare un Trunks del futuro, e neanche uno del passato. Trunks che va nel passato e trova il suo lui passato e consegna delle pillole speciali a Goku and Vegeta is training with the past, it is a mistake.
Why then Future Trunks could go back, maybe not too far behind, Trunks recovered another and then another and another and present themselves in the "present" in an army of Trunks making an ass like that at all and to end within the range of 3 / 4 episodes.
mean?
I think time travel should be made subject to a matter of awareness.
When leaving Trunks Bulma, Bulma did not really feel anything ... not sensed any change because it will continue to speak with his Trunks.
In the future there The Trunks who has already lived through, with the knowledge that he has "key on your Pellacchia.
So if the Trunks of the future is the past .... there will be 2 Trunks Trunks but a child will know that a "future" or "no future" depending on how many times he went back to change them.
Please give me a kick and let me change my mind.
0 comments:
Post a Comment